Monday, November 5, 2012

Chart of the Week: Slowest Economic Recovery Since the 1960s

Chart of the Week: Slowest Economic Recovery Since the 1960s


Americans could be waiting another five years for a return to normal employment based on the sluggish pace of the U.S. economy. After nearly four years in office, President Obama has overseen the worst recovery since the 1960s.
This week’s chart comes on the heels of Friday’s employment report, which showed an uptick in the unemployment rate to 7.9 percent. The labor market added 171,000 jobs in October, a pace that won’t result in full employment until 2017, according to Heritage’s Rea Hederman and James Sherk. They explain:
Normally, the economy grows rapidly after a severe recession. Entrepreneurs and investors typically find new ways to employ idled workers productively. In every recession in the post-war era—including the more severe 1981–1982 recession—employment fully recovered within four years of the recession’s onset. That has not happened in this recovery. Employers have 4.2 million fewer workers on their payrolls than they did in December 2007.
The 7.9 percent unemployment rate today is higher than when Obama took office in January 2009. And as Heritage’s J.D. Foster reminds us, the numbers paint a dismal picture for Obama’s record on job creation:
President Obama promised during the 2008 campaign (and after) that under his policies, the economy would create millions of new jobs by the end of 2010. He also insisted that he be held accountable for these results, a request that may soon come to pass. By December 2010, the Obama jobs deficit—the difference between the Obama jobs target and actual payroll employment—stood at 8.3 million jobs. That was 8.3 million examples of how Obama’s policies, most especially his irresponsible deficit spending, have failed to deliver on his promised job creation.
Today the Obama jobs deficit stands at 7.7 million — a figure that Foster says is a “clear sign of failure.”

Bill O'Reilly: Threats from the far|left over the presidential vote | Talking Points | The O'Reilly Factor

Bill O'Reilly: Threats from the far|left over the presidential vote | Talking Points | The O'Reilly Factor

By Bill O'Reilly

In a moment, I will play you a political ad that's very hard to believe. It was financed by moveon.org, which has close ties to the Democratic Party. MoveOn is financed by people like George Soros and is not a fringe group. It has plenty of money and has direct access to many liberal politicians. Just one week before the presidential vote MoveOn put out this ad on the net.
 
 

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I want the Republican Party to know if your voter suppression throughout this beautiful country enables Romney to oust Barack Obama, we will burn this (EXPLETIVE DELETED) town.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: If the Republicans steal this election, I'm going to track down Mitt Romney and give him the world's biggest (EXPLETIVE DELETED) punch.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O'REILLY: That first woman who was swearing 97 years old. And that spot was helped out by our pal Michael Moore. So now, the far-left is threatening violence if President Obama loses the election. That's what they are doing with old ladies.

Now, to be fair, the Obama campaign most likely has nothing to do with that. They would be crazy to associate with those loons. However, you judge people by their associations. And that's what's very troubling about the Democratic Party in general. Most Democrats are honorable people -- civil, patriotic, well-intentioned. But there is a lunatic fringe that has a lot of say in the party. We saw at the Democratic convention in charlotte where a number of far-left individuals were given high profile speaking platforms.

"Talking Points" is not an ideologue. I vote for the candidate I think will solve the most problems. I voted for people in both parties. But now I'm very uneasy -- very uneasy with the direction the Democratic Party is taking.

President Obama cultivates some far-left people. He doesn't repudiate them. He definitely will not repudiate that vile ad you just saw. That makes the President somewhat culpable. Remember the civil stuff that he said in Arizona. Is that civil?

Now for those of you keeping score, there is certainly craziness on the right, we all know that. But the far-right did not have much clout in Tampa, hardly any at the Republican convention. There is a vast difference in presentation between the GOP and the Dems.

The election next Tuesday is a referendum on Barack Obama. Do you want his liberal governance or not? And if you do want it, then you have to accept the far-left loons that come along with it.

And that's "The Memo."

- You can catch Bill O'Reilly's "Talking Points Memo" weeknights at 8 and 11 p.m. ET on the Fox News Channel and any time on foxnews.com/oreilly. Send your comments to: oreilly@foxnews.com.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/2012/11/01/bill-oreilly-threats-far-left-over-presidential-vote?intcmp=obnetwork#ixzz2BP8oVabP

Pakistani parents say they killed 15-year-old daughter with acid for eyeing boy | Fox News

Pakistani parents say they killed 15-year-old daughter with acid for eyeing boy | Fox News


A Pakistani couple accused of killing their 15-year-old daughter by pouring acid on her carried out the attack because she sullied the family's honor by looking at a boy, the couple said in an interview broadcast Monday by the BBC.

The girl's death underlines the problem of so-called "honor killings" in Pakistan where women are often killed for marrying or having relationships not approved by their families or because they are perceived to have somehow dishonored their family.

The girl's parents, Mohammad Zafar and his wife Zaheen, recounted the Oct. 29 incident from jail. The father said the girl had turned to look at a boy who drove by on a motorcycle, and he told her it was wrong.

"She said `I didn't do it on purpose. I won't look again.' By then I had already thrown the acid. It was her destiny to die this way," the girl's mother told the British broadcaster.

Television footage of the couple showed them standing behind bars in separate, but adjoining jail cells.

The father said the family had already come under public censure because of their older daughter's behavior, but he did not detail what exactly he meant.

Pakistani officials initially said the attack occurred because the girl supposedly had an affair with a boy.

According to the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, at least 943 women were killed in the name of honor last year. Only 20 of the women were reported to have been given medical care before they died, the report said. The real toll is believed to be higher because many of the crimes go unreported.

"Throughout the year, women were callously killed in the name of honor when they went against family wishes in any way, or even on the basis of suspicion that they did so. Women were sometimes killed in the name of honor over property disputes and inheritance rights," the report said.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/11/05/pakistan-parents-say-killed-15-year-old-daughter-with-acid-for-eyeing-boy/?cmpid=NL_FNTopHeadlines#ixzz2BP6zIU00

Top GOP senator blasts Obama's Libya claims after release of old interview | Fox News

Top GOP senator blasts Obama's Libya claims after release of old interview | Fox News


A top Republican senator blasted President Obama on Monday after newly released footage of an interview conducted a day after the Libya consulate attack shows the president appearing to refrain from describing the attack as "terrorism."
CBS News posted the full exchange from its Sept. 12 "60 Minutes" interview on Sunday, with just two days to go before the presidential election. In it, Obama was asked directly if he thought the killing of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was a terrorist attack.
"Well it’s too early to tell exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans," Obama said. "And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other."
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., in a statement released Monday, accused Obama of contradicting "the narrative he tried to create in the second presidential debate," in which Obama asserted that he had alluded to "acts of terror" in speaking from the Rose Garden on the day of the Libya attack.
"This video from CBS News, which only came to light yesterday, would have played an important role in setting the record straight and put to rest the false narratives the Obama administration has tried to create," Graham said.
He also accused CBS News of misleading its viewers.
“Some CBS reporters have tried to report on the Benghazi debacle and have brought important information to light," Graham said. "Unfortunately, this important information was withheld from the American people who deserved to hear what President Obama said.”
Republicans have made the Libya attack an issue in trying to undercut Obama's foreign policy record. A local Libyan extremist group known as Ansar al-Sharia is suspected of carrying out the strike.
In addition to questioning the Obama administration's confusing explanation of the attack, Republicans have pointed to evidence that requests for more diplomatic security in Libya were ignored and that it was clear in advance that the consulate was unable to withstand a coordinated attack.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/05/top-gop-senator-blasts-obama-libya-claims-after-release-old-interview/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BP6hgeg3

NY Gov. Cuomo signs order allowing Sandy victims to vote anywhere | Fox News

NY Gov. Cuomo signs order allowing Sandy victims to vote anywhere | Fox News

  • NYVote.jpg
    Nov. 5, 2012: A sign erected by a community group called Rebuild Rockaway shows voting locations in the Rockaway neighborhoods of the borough of Queens, New York, in the wake of Superstorm Sandy. Election officials are ordering generators, moving voting locations and figuring out how to transport poll workers displaced from coastal areas as Tuesday's presidential election became the latest challenge for states whacked by Superstorm Sandy. The storm, which devastated East Coast communities with power outages, flooding and snow, had already disrupted early voting in parts of Maryland, West Virginia, New Jersey and North Carolina. (AP)

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has agreed to issue an executive order that will allow displaced voters to cast ballots by affidavit at any polling site they can reach Tuesday.
The order will permit voters to sign affidavits that they're legally registered to vote in the presidential and state races and cast ballots at any open polling site, even those outside their neighborhoods.
But they won't be able to vote for state legislative candidates unless the polling place is within the proper legislative district.
New Jersey is allowing voters to use provisional ballots at any polling site.
Common Cause-New York and the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School urged the action earlier Monday.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/05/cuomo-signs-order-allowing-sandy-victims-to-vote-anywhere/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BP5nWnnc

Dems downplay Tea Party impact, as activists counter they're still a potent force | Fox News

Dems downplay Tea Party impact, as activists counter they're still a potent force | Fox News

Backers of the Tea Party movement have a message for Democrats who say the movement is over: Reports of its death are greatly exaggerated.

The Tea Party label has not dominated this year’s electoral narrative the way it did in 2010, but with fiscal responsibility and government reform front and center in 2012, advocates say they are still setting – and expanding – the agenda.

“I’ve watched as the Tea Party has broadened out,” Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, an outspoken supporter, said. “Two and a half years ago, they consistently said, ‘We’re not going to address social issues; we’re only going to address fiscal and constitutional issues.’ Now… it’s the full spectrum.”

King and other Tea Party lawmakers are hitting back at a claim by House Democrats that the sun has set on the small-government movement that swept the country during the last elections.

“The 2012 elections have been the undoing of the 2010 Tea Party tsunami that crashed upon Washington,” the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee said in a memo released Monday. “The Tea Party is over.”

Citing anemic approval ratings for the Republican-led House, the DCCC argues that several Tea Party-backed lawmakers have since moderated their rhetoric in order to win re-election. The memo suggests that efforts by Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., a onetime presidential hopeful and founder of the congressional Tea Party Caucus, to portray herself as a bipartisan, independent voice contradict her conservative reputation. It also accuses Tea Party favorite Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., a freshman locked in a tight re-election battle, of watering down his polarizing image by promising to protect Medicare and Social Security.

“In nearly every competitive race, these Tea Party favorites have given up on the Tea Party,” the DCCC declares.

The mention drew a sharp response from the West campaign.

“Another day and another ridiculous memo from the losers at the DCCC,” West spokesman Tim Edson said. “It is House Democrats that have to disguise their disastrous agenda. Congressman West is talking about the issues in the same straightforward terms he always has.”

Edson added that the campaign arm of House Democrats has no credibility given that political handicappers agree the Democrats are unlikely to regain control of the House.

In the Democratic-controlled Senate, the Tea Party is looking to expand its influence this year. Conservatives Ted Cruz in Texas and Richard Mourdock in Indiana edged out moderate Republicans in their primaries, while Rep. Jeff Flake, a longtime deficit hawk, is vying for the Senate seat in Arizona. If the trio is victorious, they “will continue to carry the Tea Party message and influence well into the next few decades of American politics,” said Brendan Steinhauser of FreedomWorks, an organization that works closely with Tea Party groups.

While recent polls show Cruz and Flake favored to win their races, Mourdock’s controversial comment that pregnancy resulting from rape would be “something that God intended” have the state treasurer and onetime front-runner now trailing Democratic opponent Rep. Joe Donnelly.

Indeed, critics of the Tea Party have labeled the Indiana Senate contest as a redux of 2010, when a crop of conservative candidates garnered primary wins but were unable to win the general election in several key states. The Donnelly campaign is doing its best to exploit Mourdock’s comments.

“He has questioned the constitutionality of Social Security and Medicare, he said pregnancies resulting from rape are something God intended, and claimed he didn’t take a pledge to support every job in Indiana,” spokeswoman Elizabeth Shappell said. “Hoosiers deserve a common sense, middle-of-the-road leader like Joe Donnelly, not an extremist like Richard Mourdock.”


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/05/dems-downplay-tea-party-impact-as-activists-counter-theyre-still-potent-force/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BP5UJLxM

Christie: Call from Springsteen made me weep | Fox News

Christie: Call from Springsteen made me weep | Fox News

New Jersey's famously tough-talking governor finally got a hug from his longest-running unrequited love.

Speaking Monday at a briefing on storm recovery. Gov. Chris Christie revealed he unexpectedly spoke with Bruce Springsteen earlier in the day. Christie had been discussing storm-related matters with President Barack Obama when Obama handed the phone to Springsteen, who was traveling with him as part of a campaign trip.

Christie also said he got a hug from Springsteen at Friday's benefit concert for victims of Superstorm Sandy.

The famously liberal Springsteen had never previously acknowledged the Republican governor. Christie considers himself among The Boss' biggest fans and has attended hundreds of his concerts.

Christie has praised Obama's handling of the storm, while continuing to back Mitt Romney.

Christie says he wept at home after talking by phone to his idol, calling it a major highlight during a tough week.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/05/christie-call-from-springsteen-made-me-weep/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BP5FDDmg

State ballot questions to shape landscape on social issues, marijuana policy and more | Fox News

State ballot questions to shape landscape on social issues, marijuana policy and more | Fox News



Voters on Election Day 2012 are doing more than choosing the next president, or deciding the balance of power in Congress. Across the country, they'll be tasked with settling tricky -- and albeit, perennial -- questions on issues like marijuana, same-sex marriage, abortion and the death penalty.
But this year’s state ballots also include a few more surprising issues such as measures related to President Obama’s health care law, even after a Supreme Court ruling said it was constitutional.
A total of 38 states on Tuesday will consider 174 ballot measures, including 12 referendums, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The following is a list of top ballot measure issues, the states in which voters will decide them and in some cases the likelihood of passage.
Health Care
Alabama - Amendment 6: Prohibits individuals and businesses from being compelled to participate in health care system.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes.
Florida – Constitutional Amendment 1: Prohibits individuals and businesses from being required to participate in health care system.
Approval threshold: At least 60 percent of measure votes.
Montana – Legislative Referendum No. 122: Prohibits individuals and businesses from being required to participate in health care system.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes.
Wyoming – Proposed Constitutional Amendment A: Declares that no person shall be required to participate in a health care system.
Approval threshold: Majority of the general electorate.
Marijuana
Arkansas -- Issue No. 5: Permits medical use of marijuana.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to fail).
Colorado -- Amendment 64: Legalizes and taxes marijuana.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (too close to call).
Massachusetts -- Question 3: Permits medical use of marijuana.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes and at least 30 percent of the voters who cast ballots (likely to pass.)
Montana -- Initiative Referendum No. 124: Asks voters to repeal state law (SB 423) that weakens a voter-approved initiative allowing medical use of marijuana.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes.
Oregon – State Measure 80: Legalizes possession and sale through state-licensed stores.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to fail).
Washington -- Initiative Measure No. 502: Legalizes production, possession, distribution of marijuana.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to pass).
Taxes
Arizona -- Proposition 204: Makes permanent temporary sales tax increase from 5.5 percent to 6.5 percent expiring in 2013, dedicates revenue to education, mandates annual increases in education spending.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to fail).
Arkansas -- Issue No.1: Levies 0.5 percent sales tax to fund $1.3 billion bond issue for roads.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (no recent polling).
California -- Proposition 30: Increases income taxes on wealthy, increases sales taxes, to fund schools. Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown’s measure.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to pass).
California -- Proposition 38: Increases income tax rates for 12 years to fund schools/early education.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to fail).
Missouri – Proposition B: Increases tobacco taxes, dedicates revenue to health education.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to pass).
Oklahoma -- State Question No. 758: Limits annual increase to 3 percent, now 5 percent.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes.
Oregon -- State Measure 84: Eliminates estate/inheritance taxes.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes.
Same-Sex Marriage
(FOR)
Maine -- Question 1: Legalizes same-sex marriage, would overturn a 2009 initiative.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to pass).
Maryland -- Question 6: Uphold the new law legalizing same-sex marriage.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (too close to call).
(AGAINST)
Minnesota -- Amendment 1: Defines marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
Approval threshold: Majority of Election Day voters, not just measure voters (too close to call).
Washington -- Referendum Measure No. 74: Asks voters to repeal SB 6239 that legalized same-sex marriage.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (too close to call).
Death Penalty
California -- Proposition 34: Abolishes death penalty.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (too close to call).
Illegal Immigration
Maryland -- Question 4: Sometimes called the "Dream Act," would allow some illegal immigrants to pay in-state college tuition.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to pass).
Montana -- Legislative Referendum No. 121: Legislative statute denying state services to illegal immigrants.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes.
Abortion
Florida -- Constitutional Amendment 6: Prohibits use of public funds for abortion.
Approval threshold: At least 60 percent of measure votes (too close to call).
Collective Bargaining
Michigan -- Proposal 12-2: Establishes right to collective bargaining for public and private sector workers.
Approval threshold: Majority of measure votes (likely to fail).
Right to Die
Massachusetts -- Question 2: Would allow terminally ill patients to receive a lethal dose of drugs.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/05/state-ballots-tuesday-include-usual-death-taxes-along-with-four-on-obamacare/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BP4RrNJt

Swing-state papers flip to Romney ahead of Election Day | Fox News

Swing-state papers flip to Romney ahead of Election Day | Fox News

The race for the White House is airtight hours before Election Day. But in the battle of swing-state newspaper endorsements, Mitt Romney appears to be winning -- aided in large part by papers that switched from backing Obama in 2008 to supporting the 2012 Republican nominee.

According to an analysis by Poynter, Romney has bagged a total of 24 swing-state newspaper endorsements, to Obama's 15. Across the country, at least 30 newspapers also flipped from backing Obama in 2008 to backing Romney this year.


They include some major swing-state papers, including the Wisconsin State Journal. In its editorial Sunday, the newspaper called Obama the "more likable and inspiring speaker." However, the editorial said, "this election is about jobs ... This is now Obama's economy, even though the GOP shares in the blame for partisan games."

The State Journal joined the Des Moines Register, Naples Daily News, Reno Gazette-Journal and the Orlando Sentinel, among others, in flipping to back Romney.


The New York Daily News also made waves this weekend by endorsing Romney, after having backed Obama in 2008.

"Four years ago, the Daily News endorsed Obama, seeing a historic figure whose intelligence, political skills and empathy with common folk positioned him to build on the small practical experience he would bring to the world's toughest job," the endorsement in part states. "We valued Obama's pledge to govern with bold pragmatism and bipartisanship. The hopes of those days went unfulfilled."

According to Poynter, at least three papers flipped from Sen. John McCain in 2008 to Obama this year. They were the San Antonio Express-News, The San Francisco Examiner and the Winston-Salem Journal.

Several other newspapers abstained from endorsing anybody this year after backing Obama four years ago -- including the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the Palm Beach Post and the Dayton Daily News.

The following is Poynter's tally of newspapers that flipped from Obama to Romney:

Billings Gazette

Cape Cod Times

Casper Star-Tribune

The Columbian

The Daily Herald

Los Angeles Daily News

Daily Tribune

The Dallas Morning News

Des Moines Register

Florida Times-Union

Florida Today

Fort Worth Star-Telegram

Houston Chronicle

The Journal & Courier

The Joplin Globe

Naples Daily News

New York Daily News

New York Observer

Newsday

Orlando Sentinel

Pasadena Star-News

Pensacola News Journal

Press-Telegram -- Long Beach, Calif.

Quad-City Times

Reno Gazette-Journal

Shreveport Times

South Florida Sun Sentinel

The Telegraph -- Nashua, N.H.

The Tennessean

Wisconsin State Journal


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/05/swing-state-papers-flip-to-romney-ahead-election-day/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BP1mAZAv

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Trumka Promises More than 2,000 Union ‘Poll Monitors’ in Battleground States | CNSNews.com

Trumka Promises More than 2,000 Union ‘Poll Monitors’ in Battleground States | CNSNews.com

richard trumka
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka (AP Photo)

(CNSNews.com) - Setting the scene for possible post-election legal challenges, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said his unions plan to deploy 2,000 “poll monitors” who will be linked with lawyers around the country as a way to prevent
"voter suppression" in states such as Ohio.
During a media conference call on Thursday, Trumka recalled being at an early voting site in Las Vegas where he saw “challengers inside.”
“We’re going to have over 2,000 people that are going to be available as poll monitors that’ll be connected to a number of lawyers around the country. So that if they [the opposition] attempt to deny them the right to vote, or hassle them we’ll be able to have a rapid response team that will respond immediately to that and protect them,” Trumka said.

“That will be up in the core states like Ohio, where we think there could be problems and so we’ll challenge those everywhere we can and protect the votes,” he said.
Trumka said AFL-CIO has a call-in number for voters to report instances of alleged voter suppression.
“We’re encouraging people to report any problems to our 1-866-OUR-VOTE begin_of_the_skype_highlighting FREE 1-866-OUR-VOTE end_of_the_skype_highlighting number,” he said. “We want to ensure that working family voters know how to get information about elections in their state as well as who to call if they have trouble on Election Day.”
Also on the call was AFL-CIO Political Director Michael Podhorzer, who along with Trumka discussed AFL-CIO’s final campaign efforts leading up to Election Day, particularly in battleground states such as Ohio.

Biden has two-gaffe Sunday in Ohio, both related to former President Clinton | Fox News

Biden has two-gaffe Sunday in Ohio, both related to former President Clinton | Fox News


  • Biden_Cleveland.jpg
    Sunday, Nov. 4, 2012: Amira Nasrallah, reacts to meeting Vice President Joe Biden during his visit to My Friends Cafe , in Cleveland, Ohio. (AP)

Vice President Joe Biden had a couple minor gaffes Sunday in Ohio.
He's mistakenly referred to "President Clinton" instead of "President Obama."
Biden told a crowd of 1,200 people at Lakewood High School that a Republican ad claiming Jeep will move jobs out of Ohio was "pernicious," and a sign that Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is desperate to win the state.
The gaffe-prone Biden said the ad claims "President Clinton bankrupted Chrysler so that Italians could buy it to ship jobs overseas to China."
Earlier in the day, in a conversation inside a Cleveland diner, Biden referenced Slovakia and his role in convincing President Clinton to go after former Serbian President Slobodan Milosovic.
He was presumably referring to Slovenia, the nation that formed part of Yugoslavia before it broke up into several independent countries.
In addition, Biden recently referred to Virginia's Democratic Senate candidate Tim Kaine as "Tom" and complained to an Ohio audience about TV ads "here in Iowa."
Biden, who also is known for going off script, did not correct himself on Sunday and the crowd at the high school outside Cleveland appeared not to notice.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/04/biden-has-two-gaffe-sunday-in-ohio-both-related-to-former-president-clinton/#ixzz2BIP3JaWP

Vote Against G-d and Jerusalem - Vote Obama - Op-Eds - Israel National News#.UJbdOUL1Dw5

Vote Against G-d and Jerusalem - Vote Obama - Op-Eds - Israel National News#.UJbdOUL1Dw5

Published: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 1:31 PM
This is what we posted yesterday:" Look at the party platform, Jewish Democrats, and see what you are and are not voting for. Then think about it." It looks as though they did. G-d is back, so is Jerusalem.





It is all very clear and quite simple – ff you listened carefully to President Obama. He says what he thinks quite clearly. He is supremely confident (arrogant), and one simply has to listen to his language to know what his actions will be.

Analyze some of the changes to the presidential elections' platform presented to the Democratic National Convention (DNC) on Tuesday:

There is no commitment to Jerusalem's status as Israel's capital.
In 2008, the DNC platform included the following:
"The United States and its Quartet partners should continue to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel's right to exist, and abides by past agreements. Sustained American leadership for peace and security will require patient efforts and the personal commitment of the President of the United States. The creation of a Palestinian state through final status negotiations, together with an international compensation mechanism, should resolve the issue of Palestinian refugees by allowing them to settle there, rather than in Israel. All understand that it is unrealistic to expect the outcome of final status negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949. Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel.The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths".
That paragraph is gone in 2012. This year’s platform makes no mention of Jerusalem, and is consistent with previous Obama talk regarding moving of the borders.
The status of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital is something which is non-negotiable – and the platform change is consistent with the Obama administration viewpoints on Jerusalem (it is not Israel’s capital), borders (negotiations should start at the 1949 armistice lines), and settlements (they should be frozen).

The DNC Obama platform also removed language which speaks of isolating Hamas, and while the previous platform called for Palestinian refugees to be settled in a future Palestinian state — and explicitly not in Israel — the 2012 platform makes no mention of the "refugee" issue.
Even uber-liberal Alan Dershowitz had to acknowledge that it’s a problem , commenting “…I think the omissions are troubling — particularly the omission about the Palestinian refugee issue and Hamas are, I think, deeply troubling.”

Obama has been the most anti-Israel candidate ever to occupy the White House, so perhaps it’s not surprising - after all, the two are connected - that while the 2008 DNC platform mentioned God 100 times, the 2012 platform doesn't mention God at all.
In 2008, the party platform read: “We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values, and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential”
That plank has been rewritten to remove the phrase "God-given." Fitting for a man who believes government provides for people, rather than them creating with hard work, as entrepreneurs did. As Obama said, “You didn’t build that” – he believes government did.
Given Obama’s anti-Israel and other anti-God stances, it is perhaps justified that God’s name was dropped from the platform.
Obama, during the 2008 campaign, told “Joe the Plumber” that he needed to “spread the wealth around” – clearly that “wealth” means socialist values – which are ungodly, don’t extend to Israel and are not the American Way.
It should be quite clear for all voters that this election is really about choices and core values – about the economy, religion, foreign policy and the direction of America.
American Jews voting Obama are voting against Jerusalem being the capital city of our people, since King David set it up as such more than 3,000 years ago.
I'd rather be a Jew with Jerusalem as the capital of Israel than an Obama supporter without Jerusalem.
Ronn Torossian is CEO of 5WPR, a leading US PR Agency

AFL-CIO Warns Oregon Voters: 'Your voting history is a matter of public record'

AFL-CIO Warns Oregon Voters: 'Your voting history is a matter of public record'

Voters in Oregon are receiving a mailer from the AFL-CIO that could imply their votes in the upcoming election will not be secret.

"Your voting history is a matter of public record," the mailer says on the cover of a trifold pamphlet, which lists the union's positions and its endorsed state and local candidates inside.
In fact, a voter's precise vote is secret, though the fact that they have returned a ballot in Oregon's mail-in elections would be a matter of public record.
The reverse cover of the pamphlet features an historic photograph of a union strike, in which the worker in front is carrying a poster that reads: "DO NOT CROSS OUR PICKET LINE."
The message was alarming enough to prompt some residents to forward the mailer to Breitbart News. The cover is depicted above.
Further information was provided by http://www.redstatements.co.

Articles: Obama's Communist Party Endorsement

Articles: Obama's Communist Party Endorsement


Painful as it may be, please take two minutes out of your life to peruse the following list of "accomplishments" touted by an Obama campaign website making its case for his re-election.
The huge voter surge in 2008 elected Barack Obama, the first African American president. In the face of non-stop opposition, he pushed through:
  • Affordable Health Care Act extends coverage to 35 million uninsured people, outlaws denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions and extends until age 26 coverage of children under their parents [sic] plans.
  • Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act for equal pay for women.
  • Stabilized the economy with $789 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that saved or created 3 million jobs. Invested billions in clean energy jobs, saved the auto industry.
  • Unemployment benefits for millions of workers despite Republican threats to shut down the government. Obama was forced to yield on Bush-era tax cuts for the rich that he wanted to terminate.
  • Appointed two women to the U.S. Supreme Court, including the first Latina woman, who support the rights of working people.
  • Established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and used a recess-appointment to name the director over Republican opposition.
  • Created a new food safety agency to protect people from food-borne illness.
  • Ended profit-grab by private banks on students [sic] loans, reestablishing Federal control on these loans and used the savings to extend loans to more students.
  • Doubled the funding for Pell Grants to $32 billion, increasing size of the grant $819 to a maximum of $5,500.
  • Ended the war in Iraq and moved toward ending the war in Afghanistan.
Dull, isn't it? It's dull because you have heard it all before. The Democratic National Convention resounded with these talking points all week long. Obama and his surrogates have recited them all for months, years.
And from which "Obama 2012" website did I copy and paste this dreadful resume of progressive policy and executive overreach?
Actually, I copied it from the website of the Communist Party USA. Their homepage features a headline article, "Why Vote?" This article offers the above list of Obama's achievements, prefaced by a warning:
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and many others, died for a most precious human right, the right to vote. Now, the same racists who denied Black voters ballot rights in the 1960s are trying to keep voters from the polls in 2012.
In the old days, they called it a "poll tax." They rode at night and wore white sheets. Today, they wear expensive suits. But they still steal elections by cutting off early voting, by imposing photo ID requirements that poor voters can't afford. It's called "voter suppression."
It will take a fight to defeat these dirty tricks. Voter suppression tactics violate the letter and spirit of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Everything from sit-ins to mass rallies on state capitol steps are called for.
This is not the first time the CPUSA has officially supported Obama, of course. Alternative media voices have been trying to break through the MSM soundproofing on this matter for some time. (Examples here and here.) The wording of this year's endorsement is particularly full-throated, however, which in itself ought to be disturbing to anyone still on the fence about the nature of the man, his party, and his policies. And while the extreme race-baiting language used in the endorsement is more in keeping with the rhetorical tone of the Weather Underground or MSNBC than with that of "respectable" Democrat sources, is its point any different in principle from many things we hear from elected Democrats every day?
Nevertheless, we must not allow the extreme rhetoric in which the endorsement is couched to distract us from a more fundamental issue, which is this: the CPUSA endorses Barack Obama on the very same grounds -- even in the same words -- that Obama uses in defense of himself.
If a communist were operating under the official umbrella of the Democratic Party, and were thus forced to use Democrat talking points rather than speak his own radical mind, we would interpret this as typical leftist cynicism and subterfuge. But this time the words appear on the CPUSA's own website. These are the words the official voice of international communism in America is choosing to use to explain its reasoning to its own target audience. No one visiting the CPUSA site is confused about the nature of the organization. The website's slogan is "Radical Ideas. Real Politics." The Party's prominently displayed self-description appears just under the Obama endorsement:
A better and peaceful world is possible -- a world where people and nature come before profits. That's socialism. That's our vision. We are the Communist Party USA.
The homepage includes links to their sister site, "People's World," featuring articles with titles such as "Romney-Ryan white skin strategy" and a policy statement from Party leader Sam Webb: "Defeating the Rightwing on the Road to Socialism."
In short, while communist propaganda is by definition a pack of lies, the CPUSA is refreshingly up-front about one thing: their primary and defining purpose is to achieve communism in the United States of America. In pursuit of that defining purpose, they have for years thrown their lot in with the Democratic Party, and they are now very strongly advocating for Barack Obama in particular.
The point here is not to accuse Obama of guilt by association. The endorsement of communists does not prove him a communist.
The interesting question, however, is this: why does the CPUSA, in speaking to its own members, urge them to support Obama by citing the very policies and decisions that Obama himself is most proud of?
The answer is as unavoidable as it is straightforward: the Communist Party regards Barack Obama's signature achievements and defining principles as consistent with, and conducive to, its own defining goal -- namely, the establishment of a socialist workers' state in America. And of course, as America's official defenders of the Marxist flame, they certainly know whereof they speak. Their belief is quite correct, and conservatives ought to be happy to help them make their case.
ObamaCare is an important step on the path to the full denial of the individual's right to self-preservation.
Equal pay legislation grants the government the power to determine the value of "commodities," including labor, and thereby directly undermines the foundations of the free market, voluntarism, and private property.
"Investing billions" in "jobs," "saving the auto industry," and the "new food safety agency" advance the goal of "workers'" (aka government's) control of the means of production.
"Unemployment benefits for millions of workers" [insert own joke here].
The "rights of workers" advanced by Obama's two female Supreme Court appointments are perfectly in line with the slogan the CPUSA loaned to the Democrats on day one of the latter's convention: "Progress for People," where "people," like "workers," is a time-honored "code word" for the proletariat.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, resulting from the Dodd-Frank legislation, and constructed by Elizabeth "Cherokee" Warren, is a practical step toward Marxism's key goal of eliminating private banking.
In sum, the Communist Party loves the same Obama policies and accomplishments that the Democratic Party establishment loves, that the mainstream media loves, that the unions love, and that Charles Schumer, Jennifer Granholm, Harry Reid, and Dick Durbin love. They want more of the same. The CPUSA sees what most of us see, and what the Democratic Party would somehow like to keep its permanent underclass -- um, that is, its voter base -- from seeing: the Obama agenda is driving America "forward" on "the Road to Socialism." The only difference is that the communists are honest enough to spell it out.
The Obama campaign is unlikely to trumpet this particular ringing endorsement between now and Election Day. That's no reason for the rest of the world to remain quiet about it. On the contrary, this deserves to be shouted from the rooftops.
Communists for Obama!


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/obamas_communist_party_endorsement.html#ixzz2BIMKxL1y

Iran claims production of new advanced drone - Military News | News From Afghanistan, Iraq And Around The World - Military Times

Iran claims production of new advanced drone - Military News | News From Afghanistan, Iraq And Around The World - Military Times

The Associated Press
Posted : Sunday Nov 4, 2012 10:05:32 EST

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran’s media is reporting the country has produced a domestically-made drone capable of hovering in midair.
The Sunday report by several newspapers including the conservative Resalat says an advanced vertical take-off and landing or VTOL drone will be displayed in February.
Resalat quoted Abbas Jam, who is director of the project, as saying that the drone can also fly in silence.
Earlier in October Iran said it obtained images of sensitive Israeli bases taken by a drone that was launched by Lebanon’s Hezbollah movement that month and downed by Israel.
Iran says other drones made dozens of apparently undetected flights into Israeli airspace from Lebanon in recent years. Israel has rejected that.
Iran frequently claims breakthroughs in military technology and other achievements. Most are impossible to independently confirm.

CIA Timeline Confirms: Woods and Doherty Killed in Benghazi 7Hrs After WH Told of Attack; Commercial Airliner Can Fly From London to Libya and Back in That Time | CNSNews.com

CIA Timeline Confirms: Woods and Doherty Killed in Benghazi 7Hrs After WH Told of Attack; Commercial Airliner Can Fly From London to Libya and Back in That Time | CNSNews.com


Barack Obama
President Barack Obama speaking at the U.N. General Assembly on Sept. 25, where he talked at length about a "disgusting video" that had been posted on YouTube and that U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice had earlier pointed to as the root cause of the 9/11/12 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)

(CNSNews.com) - What David Ignatius of The Washington Post describes as a “detailed CIA timeline” of the events that unfolded in Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 (and in the early hours of Sept. 12), confirms that former Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were not killed until seven hours after the State Department informed the White House—in writing--that the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack and that U.S. Amb. Chris Stevens was in Benghazi where the attack was taking place.
The attack started at 3:40 p.m Washington, D.C. time. The State Department sent the White House an email at 4:05 pm with this subject line: “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack.” The email said Amb. Stevens was in Benghazi.
According to the CIA timeline provided to the Washington Post and other news organizations, Woods and Doherty were killed by mortar fire while on the roof of a CIA facility in Benghazi between 11:15 p.m. and 11:26 p.m. Washington time—or between 5:15 a.m. and 5:26 a.m. Sept. 12 Benghazi time.
Between 4:05 p.m. Washington time, when the State Department emailed the White House that the U.S diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack, and 11:15 p.m., when Wood and Doherty were killed, more than seven hours passed.
On Expedia.com, British Airways is currently advertizing a non-stop flight from London to Libya on Nov. 15--via an Airbus A320--that is expected to have a duration of 3 hours and 30 minutes. That means that in the seven hours that elapsed between when the State Department informed the White House that the U.S. mission in Benghazi was under attack and when Woods and Doherty were killed, a common commercial airliner—not a military jet--could have flown from England to Libya and back.
White House National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, according to reporting by CBS News, personally informed President Obama of the ongoing attack in Benghazi before Obama went into a pre-scheduled 5:00 p.m. meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Vice President Joe Biden.
(On Tuesday, CNSNews.com asked the Defense Department whether this previously scheduled meeting between Obama and Panetta had in fact taken place, whether Panetta was aware at that time of the ongoing attack in Benghazi that the State Department had reported to both the Pentagon and the White House at 4:05 p.m., and whether the president had used that meeting to discuss with Panetta what should be done to defend the Americans in Benghazi. Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, a department spokesman, told CNSNews.com at that time: “Panetta met with President Obama, as the White House-provided scheduled indicates. However, neither the content nor the subject of discussions between the President and his advisers are appropriate for disclosure.”)
CBS reported that after National Security Adviser Donilon initially notified Obama of the Benghazi attack just before the 5:00 p.m. meeting with Panetta the president was subsequently “updated several times throughout the evening.”
The CIA timeline was provided to some news organizations on Thursday to demonstrate that the administration was getting a bum rap from those who said it reacted too slowly to the 9/11/12 terrorist attack in Libya.
According to the timeline, as published by the Associated Press, a security team left the CIA annex in Benghazi to go to the aid of the nearby consulate less than 25 minutes after the attack started at 9:40 p.m Benghazi time (3:40 p.m. Washington time).
This team included former Navy Seal Tyrone Woods, Ignatius reported in the Washington Post. It rescued some people at the consulate, sending them back to the CIA annex.
By 11:30 p.m. this security team itself left the consulate to return--while being attacked--to the CIA annex. In the meantime, as the Los Angeles Times reported of the timeline, another security team came from Tripoli to Benghazi aboard a chartered airplane.
“[T]he CIA also sent a second six-member team from Tripoli on a chartered plane to help repel the attack," reported the Times. "This team included Glen Doherty, another former SEAL, who was later killed when attackers fired mortar rounds at the CIA Annex."
After making the short flight from Tripoli to Benghazi, however, the CIA security team had a very difficult time trying to get from the Benghazi airport to the CIA annex to which their colleagues had retreated when they left the consulate.
The AP story on the timeline says that the CIA security team from Tripoli arrived at the Benghazi airport at 1:00 a.m., but then could not “find a ride into town."
“Around 1 a.m., a team of additional security personnel from Tripoli lands at the Benghazi airport and attempts to find a ride into town. Upon learning that Stevens is missing and that the situation at the CIA annex has calmed, the team focuses on locating Stevens and obtaining information about the security situation at the hospital,” reported the AP.
“Before dawn, the team at the airport finally manages to secure transportation and armed escort,” said the AP.
At 1:00 a.m. Benghazi time, when the AP says these security reinforcements arrived at the Benghazi airport, it was 7:00 p.m. Washington, D.C. time—or about three hours after the White House had first learned of the attack
David Ignatius at the Washington Post reported that the security reinforcements from Tripoli arrived at the Benghazi airport at 1:15 a.m., but did not leave the airport until 4:30 a.m.
"1:15 a.m.: CIA reinforcements arrive on a 45-minute flight from Tripoli in a plane they’ve hastily chartered," Ignatius wrote. "The Tripoli team includes four GRS [Global Response Staff] security officers, a CIA case officer and two U.S. military personnel on loan to the agency. They don’t leave the Benghazi airport until 4:30 a.m. The delay is caused by negotiations with Libyan authorities over permission to leave the airport; obtaining vehicles; and the need to frame a clear mission plan. The first idea is to go to a Benghazi hospital to recover Stevens, who they rightly suspect is already dead. (Also killed was a State Department communication specialist.) But the hospital is surrounded by the al-Qaeda-linked Ansar al-Sharia militia that mounted the consulate attack."
Between when these CIA security reinforcements landed in Benghazi at about 1:00 a.m. or 1:15 a.m. and when they arrived at the CIA annex, about four hours elapsed, according to the reports. That alone is more than the three and a half hours it takes British Airways to fly an Airbus from London to Libya.
“5:15 a.m. The team arrives at the CIA annex, with Libyan support, just before mortar rounds begin to hit the facility,” says the AP report on the timeline. “Two CIA security officers Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty are killed when they take direct mortar fire while engaging the attackers. The attack lasts only 11 minutes before dissipating.” Doherty had come with the security team from Tripoli.
At 5:15 a.m. Benghazi time it was 11:15 p.m Washington time—seven hours and 10 minutes after the State Department sent its email notifying the White House that the U.S. mission in Benghazi was under attack.
In an interview with KUSA TV in Denver a week ago, President Obama said of the Benghazi attack: “[T]he minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.”

Voters in Pennsylvania and Ohio will become rich states if they vote for Romney | From the Right | IrishCentral

Voters in Pennsylvania and Ohio will become rich states if they vote for Romney | From the Right | IrishCentral




Voters in Pennsylvania and Ohio have a unique opportunity to make themselves energy producing giants this Tuesday, if they vote for the right candidate.

As geologists and energy experts probe what’s under the ground in these two states, it is becoming apparent they are sitting on huge reserves of natural gas. In addition to gas, they already have huge reserves of other forms of fossil fuels.

But in particular, the gas is near the surface and easy to obtain. If there is willing government cooperation from Washington DC, these states will be booming due to energy production. State treasuries would be overflowing with royalties from the billions in energy sold.

Thousands of jobs would be created on exploration, recovery, pipelines, transportation and infrastructure. Long-term employment would necessarily increase as companies look for qualified employees to help in recovering & marketing these resources.

North Dakota is a prime example of what a state can do when they pursue their energy resources. With a 3% unemployment rate, they are the lowest rate in the nation.

Under the last four years of the Obama administration, there has been a concerted effort to wage war on our energy sector. One of the key Obama EPA administrators was caught saying he wanted to crucify the energy industry. One of the biggest foes of Americas fossil fuel reserves, Bill McKibben, has the Presidents ear and was said to play a key role in his rejection of the Keystone Pipeline.

See McKibben Epstein ultimate energy debate November 5, at Duke University

For the last 4 years, the Obama administration has been quietly crucifying andhamstringing our energy sector.

The stark, easy to see result of this policy, is to pull into the gas station and fill up your car for 100.00, when it only cost 50.00 4 years ago.

Governor Romney has already promised he will encourage responsible recovery of our energy resources the first day he takes control of the reins of government.

We have already seen what 4 years of Obama policies have done to our energy sector. Energy plant shut downs-Coal mine bankruptcies-Huge tracts of federally controlled land barred from energy exploration-Billions in losses on taxpayer funded green energy schemes. The next 4 years will be all of the above, but on steroids, as he will not have to answer to the voters again.

The choice is clear for the voters in Ohio and Pennsylvania. With Romney you have the opportunity to become energy rich and create hundreds of thousands of new jobs. At the same time you can help our country become energy self sufficient.


Read more: http://www.irishcentral.com/story/news/from-the-right/voters-in-pennsylvania-and-ohio-will-become-rich-states-if-they-vote-for-romney-177169471.html#ixzz2BIKU4FWq

Obama's Record of Failure on Jobs

Obama's Record of Failure on Jobs

President Obama wants four more years because, he says, things are getting better and this is no time to turn back. And the latest jobs report to be released before the election appeared to hold good news, showing the economy created 171,000 jobs in October.
But you don't have to look very hard to see that Obama has the worst jobs record of any president in modern times.
Get QuoteSearch Site
Read Full Article »

Students for Obama: 'Obama Doesn't Deserve Four More Years'

Students for Obama: 'Obama Doesn't Deserve Four More Years'


225
9
1127

Print ArticleSend a Tip
4 Nov 2012, 3:36 AM PDT20post a comment

Much to the chagrin of the Obama campaign, Studentsforobama.org is not supporting Obama’s reelection efforts. Instead, the site greets visitors with a video message from a college student explaining why he supported Obama in 2008 but is opposing him in 2012. The site is now a project of Let Freedom Ring.

Studentsforobama.org issued this statement:
In the past four years, we have changed. We once supported President Obama. Obama made many good promises. Obama seemed non-partisan and willing to bring about change. He was charismatic. We were excited to see what would come of his administration. Sadly, Obama has failed us, instituting policies that have negatively affected us.

Because of this, Students For Obama has become Students No Longer For Obama. We have awakened to the President's failures, and we feel that it is time for a change. It's time to allow someone else a chance in the Oval Office. Obama doesn't deserve four more years of reckless behavior.
In an exclusive interview, John Cassil, a student activist heavily involved with studentsforobama.org, stated, “Being on campus for the last four years, I’ve seen student orientation take a turn from liberal leaning to libertarian leaning, with political affiliations more closely mirroring that of the Republican Party.” A senior at Clemson University majoring in management, John is troubled by the foreign policy stances of the Obama administration. As John noted, “our relationship with Israel has suffered greatly the last four years which is why I’ve become actively involved with the Young Jewish Conservatives and the Republican Jewish Coalition.”
John’s observations might not be unique to the Clemson University campus. Numerous video testimonials of students no longer supporting Obama appear on a related site.

Bloomberg: 143,000 New Yorkers will have different voting sites | Fox News

Bloomberg: 143,000 New Yorkers will have different voting sites | Fox News

Bloomberg: 143,000 New Yorkers will have different voting sites



New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced Sunday that some 143,000 voters will be reassigned to different polling stations for Election Day due to superstorm Sandy.
"Over the next day it's going to be critical that the Board of Elections communicate this to their poll workers," Bloomberg said at a press conference on Sandy recovery efforts.
He warned that the Board of Elections has a history of not communicating changes to poll workers, according to a report from Reuters.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/04/bloomberg-143000-new-yorkers-will-have-different-voting-sites/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BICTkUsg

On final Sunday, Obama asks for more time, as Romney warns about further decline | Fox News

On final Sunday, Obama asks for more time, as Romney warns about further decline | Fox News

  • obamaNH_romneyIOWA.jpg
    Sunday, Nov. 4, 2011: President Obama campaigns in Concord, N.H., while Mitt Romney rallies in Des Moines, Iowa. (AP)

President Obama on Sunday asked Americans for more time to finish what he started while Mitt Romney argued the country needs a change in leadership – as both candidates distilled the closing arguments in the final weekend of the 2012 campaign.
Obama and Romney held morning events and will go late into the night -- rallying in one battleground state, then dashing onto an airplane to reach another with two days left before Election Day.
“After all we have been through, we can’t give up now,” Obama said during an outdoor event in Concord, N.H., attended by more than 14,000 people. “I’m not ready to give up the fight.”
At practically the same time, Romney argued the president had four years to improve the country and warned that another Obama term might result in more economic decline.
“The same course we’ve been on, will not lead to a better destination,” Romney told a crowd of about 4,400 in Des Moines, Iowa. “Unless we change course, we may be looking at another recession.
"The question of this election comes down to this: Do you want four more years like the last four years, or do you want real change? President Obama promised change, but he couldn't deliver it. ... He's got excuses. I've got a plan."
The candidates are making their closing arguments Sunday in six key battleground states.
Romney also will hold rallies in Ohio and Pennsylvania, while the president visits Florida, Ohio and Colorado.
The candidates are once again tied nationally with two days remaining before Election Day, according to a Washington Post-ABC News tracking poll released Sunday.
Among likely voters, Obama and Romney are deadlocked at 48 percent. And for the first time this year, they are tied among independents voters, at 46 percent each, the poll says.
Romney’s position going into Election Day is in part the result of how he performed in the three presidential debates, The Post reports.
Before the candidates hit the trail, their top campaign officials expressed confidence about victory Tuesday and argued about who had the edge in battleground states and in early voting.
“They are in deep trouble,” Obama senior campaign adviser David Axelrod said on “Fox News Sunday.” “They understand the battleground states where they’ve been working is not working out for them.”
Rich Beeson, Romney’s political director, said the campaign has found success in a final get-out-the-vote effort that reached out to people who are not core Republicans or vote regularly.
"We've done a much, much better job of getting our low propensity voters out to vote," he told Fox. "And we've got all of our high propensity voters ready to go vote on Election Day."
On the criticism that the campaign has failed to lock down Republican-friendly Florida, Beeson said: “For them to go down and spend more money down there is a little bit like Barack Obama's government right now. They want to throw money at the problem and hope it fixes it, but at the end of the day, Gov. Romney will carry Florida by a significant margin.”
Obama's campaign is mobilizing a massive get-out-the-vote effort aimed at carrying the Democrat to victory, as Romney makes a late play for votes in Democratic-leaning Pennsylvania.
A new poll in The Pittsburgh Tribune shows the race for Pennsylvania’s 20 electoral votes locked up at 47 percent in its final week. The poll by Susquehanna Polling & Research surveyed 800 likely voters from Thursday through Saturday and most of the interviews occurred after superstorm Sandy inundated eastern and central Pennsylvania. The poll’s error margin is 3.46 percentage points, according to the newspaper.
Both campaigns have for the past few days been predicting wins in Tuesday's election. Obama was closing out the campaign with an apparent edge in some key battleground states, including Ohio. But Romney's campaign was projecting momentum and banking on late-breaking voters to propel him to victory in the exceedingly close race.
"Words are cheap and a record is real and it's earned with effort," Romney said Saturday, making a final appeal to voters in Colorado.
The Republican presidential nominee was cutting away briefly Sunday from the nine or so competitive states that have dominated the candidates' travel itineraries this fall. He and running mate Rep. Paul Ryan have an early-evening event planned in Morrisville, Pa. -- Romney’s first rally in the state this fall.
Romney's visit follows the decision by his campaign and its Republican allies to put millions of dollars in television advertising in Pennsylvania during the race's final weeks. Obama's team followed suit, making a late advertising buy of its own.
The Republican ticket cast the late push into the Keystone State as a sign that Romney had momentum and a chance to pull away states that Obama's campaign assumed it would win handily.
The president's team called the move a "Hail Mary" and a sign Romney still doesn't have a clear pathway to reaching the required 270 Electoral College votes.
Democrats have a million-voter registration advantage in Pennsylvania. Obama senior adviser David Plouffe said that means Romney would have to win two-thirds of the state's independents, a prospect he called "an impossibility."
The president caught a few hours of sleep back at the White House Saturday night before hitting the campaign trail again Sunday. After Marine One lifts off from the South Lawn Sunday morning, Obama won't return to the executive mansion again until after Election Day.
The president's rallies are aimed at boosting Democratic enthusiasm and motivating as many supporters as possible to cast their votes, either in the final hours of early voting or on Tuesday, Election Day. Persuading undecided voters, now just a tiny sliver of the electorate in battleground states, has become a secondary priority.
Obama and Clinton drew 24,000 people to an outdoor rally in Bristow, Va., on a cold Saturday night.
Obama's campaign said it had registered 1.8 million voters in key battleground states, nearly double the number of voters they registered in 2008. Campaign officials said volunteers had made 125 million personal phone calls or door knocks with voters.
Romney has also attracted large crowds in the final weekend of campaigning. His rally in Ohio on Friday drew more than 20,000 people.
Romney has been using teleprompters to deliver his final campaign speeches. He's claiming the mantle of change -- and highlighting what he says was a bipartisan record as governor of Massachusetts.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/04/obama-romney-hit-battleground-states-with-closing-arguments-for-undecided/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BI2sfFOk

Inside the geriatric unit: US Air Force struggles to keep aging aircraft flying | Fox News

Inside the geriatric unit: US Air Force struggles to keep aging aircraft flying | Fox News

Inside the geriatric unit: US Air Force struggles to keep aging aircraft flying



For decades, the U.S. Air Force has grown accustomed to such superlatives as unrivaled and unbeatable. These days, some of its key combat aircraft are being described with terms like geriatric, or decrepit.
The aging of the U.S. Air Force, a long-simmering topic in defense circles, made a brief appearance in the presidential debates when Republican nominee Mitt Romney cited it as evidence of the decline of U.S. military readiness. His contention that the Navy is the smallest it's been since 1917 got more attention, thanks to President Barack Obama's quip that the Navy also has fewer "horses and bayonets."
But analysts say the Air Force has a real problem, and it will almost certainly get worse no matter who wins Tuesday's election. It was created in part by a lack of urgency in the post-Cold War era, and by design glitches and cost overruns that have delayed attempts to build next-generation aircraft.
Looming budget cuts limit the force's ability to correct itself, they argue, as China's rise as a world power heightens its need to improve. And though the world's most formidable air force never had much use for bayonets, it's got more than its share of warhorses.
___
IKE'S LEGACY — THE KC-135 STRATOTANKER
The U.S. probably couldn't have fought the air wars over Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya without the KC-135 Stratotanker, the Air Force's main aerial refueler, which allows fighter jets to remain airborne on long flights.
America has President Dwight Eisenhower to thank for that.
The KC-135 came into service during Eisenhower's watch in 1956. The newest of the roughly 400 Stratotankers in service started flying nearly half a century ago, in 1964.
"We are in unknown territory," said Lt. Col. Brian Zoellner, who has been flying the KC-135 for 15 years and is head of operations for 909th Air Refueling Squadron at Kadena Air Base on Japan's southwestern island of Okinawa. "The unknown is at what point does the KC-135 become unusable."
The KC-46A refueling tanker is being developed as a replacement, but probably won't start delivery for another five years. If Congress has its way, some Stratotankers could still be taking off well into the 2040s.
THAT '70s SHOW — THE F-15, F-16 AND A-10
The F-15, America's workhorse warplane since the Vietnam War, was designed to have a service life of about 5,000 flight hours. The Air Force has more than tripled that, to 18,000 hours.
The F-16, another key fighter, has been in use since 1979. The Air Force began retiring the oldest ones two years ago.
Another '70s-era fighter is the A-10 Thunderbolt, which provides close air support for ground troops. It's now being rewinged because its old ones were riddled with cracks. The General Accounting Office estimates the cost of upgrading and refurbishing the aircraft will be $2.25 billion through 2013.
The Air Force is revamping its fighter fleet with the stealthy F-22 Raptor and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, but production of the F-22 was cut short after its price tag swelled to nearly half a billion dollars a pop. Delays and escalating costs have also dogged the F-35, which is now the most expensive Department of Defense procurement program ever.
SPY PLANES FROM THE '50s — THE U-2
The fabled U-2 "Dragon Lady" spy plane is still being used to keep watch over North Korea and other hot spots. The first U-2 flew in 1955, and the legendary Skunk Works aircraft became a household name for its role in the Cuban missile crisis, not to mention the propaganda bonanza the Soviet Union got by shooting one down in 1960 and capturing its CIA pilot, Francis Gary Powers.
Many analysts argue the unmanned Global Hawk could do the job more effectively, but Congress has nixed that idea for now. More than $1.7 billion has been invested in upgrading the U-2.
MAJOR KONG'S FAVORITE BOMBER — THE B-52
Iconic, yes. State-of-the-art, no. The venerable B-52, remembered by movie fans for its starring role in the 1964 Cold War comedy "Dr. Strangelove," remains the backbone of the Air Force's strategic bomber force. It dates back to 1954 and was already losing its edge by the end of the Vietnam War, but nearly 100 B-52s remain in service.
The Air Force developed the B-1 in the 1970s as the B-52's replacement. President Jimmy Carter killed it, President Ronald Reagan brought it back, and none have been delivered since 1988.
Next up was the stealth B-2 Spirit, which first flew in 1989. Because only 21 were built, they ended up costing a prohibitive $2 billion each. The Air Force is now hoping to upgrade with what it calls the Long Range Strike Bomber, but it's not clear when it will be ready.
___
To be sure, all of these aircraft have undergone massive overhauls and updates, and most experts agree the U.S. Air Force remains the best-equipped in the world. Its aircraft aren't likely to soon start falling out of the sky, either, thanks to intensive, and expensive, maintenance.
Zoellner, the KC-135 pilot, bristled at the idea his Stratotankers aren't safe. He said they "fly like a champ."
But Loren Thompson, of the Lexington Institute, a conservative think tank, said the graying Air Force is evidence of how Washington has failed to keep its eye on the ball.
"The reason the fleet is so decrepit is because for the first 10 years after the Cold War ended, policymakers thought the United States was in an era of extended peace," he said. "Then it spent the next 10 years fighting an enemy with no air force and no air defenses. So air power was neglected for 20 years, and today the Air Force reflects that fact."
Former Air Force Col. Robert Haffa, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, added that although ground forces were the primary concern in Iraq and Afghanistan, air power will be a key to future security requirements as the United States turns its attention to the Pacific and a strengthening China.
Unlike America's more recent adversaries, China has a credible air force that could conceivably strike U.S. bases in the region, requiring a deterrent force that is based farther away, out of range. America's bases in Japan — and possibly Guam — also are within striking distance of a North Korean missile attack.
"As the nation looks to increased focus in the Pacific, these long-range strike platforms will be especially important," Haffa said. "Planes like the B-52 simply cannot survive."


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/04/inside-geriatric-unit-us-air-force-struggles-to-keep-aging-aircraft-flying/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+%28Internal+-+Politics+-+Text%29#ixzz2BI2exOAH